Ok, while I do have some conservative beliefs, gay marriage is not one of them.
And here's my argument. I am doign a speech on this next week in class and actually didn't have a side until I did the research and thought about the topic through and through. I posted this in Jessica Lovejoy's comments on her post about the same topic.
Thought I'd share it here.
---------------------------------
It's amazing when you break down the structure of the argument against gay marriage. You have the "history of marriage" argument. Well, marriage has a diverse history of not only being a religious ritual, and a completely secular civil union, but it has also been temporary handfasting that expired after a year-and-a-day, and it used to be simply the transfer of control of a woman from father to husband. Hmmm.... not a history I want to hold onto, there.
Also, should the rights of religious groups to freely practice their religion overrule the rights of same-sex couples to seek equality in the eyes of the law?
And the idea of marriage being purely for procreation and the "optimal" environment to raise a family. So by not letting gays marry, they are protecting the "CHILDREN" from non-optimal family structures? Well, they still let divorced people with kids remarry, right? That's not optimal. They still let single parents roam free (hey! that's me!) despite their NON-OPTIMAL-NESS, so it makes sense that it is simply a GAY issue and not a "optimal for the children" issue. And why then are people allowed to marry and not have children if that's the whole point of marriage? If a couple gets married and doesn't have children within, oh let's say ten years, should they be forced to divorce?
And gay marriage is ungodly and immoral? Well, what about the fact that atheists can get married? How about Wiccans? Should we ban all non-christians from marrying? No, because marriage is not a religious institution unless you CHOOSE it to be such.
I come back to argument of the "rich history and tradition of marriage" which is often cited in anti gay marriage articles. Back .. oh 60+ years ago, we had a rich history of repressing women and what about our rich history in slavery and racial segregation? It wasn't until 1967 that interracial marriages were legalized and despite a large percentage of the population who protested, the courts passed it through (another argument - the courts shouldnt make these decisions, that legislation should) - and we got over that one, didn't we? The stability of family and procreation didn't come to a stand still. The world didn't end. Black men didn't break in and steal their white daughters for inter-breeding experiments.
There are 400 state & 1000 federal legal (secular and civil) rights that are awarded to married couples. So again marriage is not just a holy religious institution.
Haven't we learned anything?
They also argue to give same sex couples CIVIL UNIONS instead of "marriage".
I thought we have already experienced in this country how well "separate but equal" really works.